Most Engineering Hiring Gets This Wrong – And Formula 1 Shows Why

I watch a lot of Formula 1.

And not for the reasons most people do.

I’m far more interested in what’s happening behind the scenes than I am in who’s standing on the podium. Because if you’ve ever worked in engineering, you quickly realise that performance is rarely about the headline name—it’s about everything underneath it.

Which is exactly where most engineering hiring goes wrong.

Too many businesses are still focused on finding “the best candidate”.

On paper, it sounds sensible.

In reality, it’s one of the main reasons projects lose time.

Because engineering delivery doesn’t work like that. It’s not about individuals—it’s about systems. And more specifically, it’s about having the right capability in place at the exact point you need it.

Formula 1 gets this.

No team is sitting there waiting for the “perfect” person before they make a move. They build structures that allow them to perform under pressure, adapt quickly, and deliver consistently.

Compare that to what I see day to day.

Hiring processes that drag on for months. Roles that are over-specified and under-defined at the same time. Businesses holding out for a unicorn candidate while the project timeline quietly slips in the background.

And then the surprise when delivery starts to struggle.

From my perspective—having worked in engineering before moving into recruitment—the issue usually isn’t a lack of talent.

It’s a lack of alignment.

Alignment between what the project actually needs… and how the hiring process is set up to deliver it.

A few patterns come up time and time again:

  • Businesses prioritising “perfect fit” over timely delivery

  • Hiring decisions being made in isolation from project timelines

  • Teams built around job descriptions rather than real-world demands

None of this is new.

But it’s still happening—particularly in automotive and high-performance engineering environments where the cost of delay is significant.

The irony is that most of these problems are avoidable.

Not by hiring faster for the sake of it—but by being clearer about what success actually looks like at each stage of a project, and building your team around that.

Sometimes that means bringing in specialist contractors at the right moment.

Sometimes it means accepting that a “very good” hire now is more valuable than a “perfect” hire in three months’ time.

And sometimes it just means being honest about what you really need—rather than what the job spec says.

Final thought

Formula 1 doesn’t wait around for perfect conditions.

It builds teams that can perform in the conditions they’ve got.

And in engineering recruitment, that shift in mindset—away from perfection and towards alignment—is often what separates projects that move forward from those that stall.




Photo by KaroGraphix Photography on Unsplash

Most Engineering Hiring Gets This Wrong – And Formula 1 Shows Why
Click to enlarge

by

Co-Founder & Director